Tom Lane wrote: > > I'm not sure I believe Hannu's numbers, but in any case they're fairly > irrelevant to the argument about whether a special protocol is useful. > He wasn't testing textually-long queries, but rather the planning > overhead, which is more or less independent of the length of any literal > constants involved (especially if they're not part of the WHERE clause). > Saving query plans via PREPARE seems quite sufficient, and appropriate, > to tackle the planner-overhead issue.
Just a confirmation. Someone is working on PREPARE/EXECUTE ? What about Karel's work ? regards, Hiroshi Inoue ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
