Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takah...@gmail.com> writes:
> 2010/7/8 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
>> For example, the dictionary-load code could automatically execute
>> the precompile step if it observed that the precompiled copy of the
>> dictionary was missing or had an older file timestamp than the source.

> There might be a problem in automatic precompiler -- Where should we
> save the result? OS users of postgres servers don't have write-permission
> to $PGSHARE in normal cases. Instead, we can store the precompiled
> result to $PGDATA/pg_dict_cache or so.

Yeah.  Actually we'd *have* to do something like that because $PGSHARE
should contain only architecture-independent files, while the
precompiled files would presumably have dependencies on endianness etc.

                        regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to