hello everybody,

we are currently facing some serious issues with cross correlation issue.
consider: 10% of all people have breast cancer. we have 2 genders (50:50).
if i select all the men with breast cancer, i will get basically nobody - the 
planner will overestimate the output.
this is the commonly known problem ...

this cross correlation problem can be quite nasty in many many cases.
underestimated nested loops can turn joins into a never ending nightmare and so 
on and so on.

my ideas is the following:
what if we allow users to specifiy cross-column combinations where we keep 
separate stats?
maybe somehow like this ...

        ALTER TABLE x SET CORRELATION STATISTICS FOR (id = id2 AND id3=id4)

or ...

        ALTER TABLE x SET CORRELATION STATISTICS FOR (x.id = y.id AND x.id2 = 
y.id2)

clearly we cannot store correlation for all combinations of all columns so we 
somehow have to limit it.

what is the general feeling about something like that?

        many thanks,

                hans

--
Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH
Gröhrmühlgasse 26
A-2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria
Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to