On Jul 15, 2010, at 12:30 AM, Richard Huxton <d...@archonet.com> wrote: > On 14/07/10 15:48, Robert Haas wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Josh Berkus<j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: >>>> An actual plan here might look like "let's flip it before 9.1alpha1 >>>> so we can get some alpha testing cycles on it" ... >>> >>> "Hey, let's flip it in 9.1 CF 1, so that we can have some alpha testing >>> cycles on it." >> >> Should we do this? Patch attached. > > Any reason not to add a line to the 9.0 docs/release notes saying "WARNING: > The PGDG currently plan to change this setting's default in 9.1"?
Well, mostly that we could change our mind if it makes too big a boom. And it's not as if we could go back and update everyone's docs after-the-fact. I agree we need some press, but the docs are not the right vehicle. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
