Excerpts from Jaime Casanova's message of jue jul 15 15:51:10 -0400 2010: > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Markus Wanner <mar...@bluegap.ch> wrote: > > > > However, note that the coordinator is designed to be just a message > > passing or routing process, which should not do any kind of time > > consuming processing. It must *coordinate* things (well, jobs) and react > > promptly. Nothing else. > > so, merging this with the autovacuum will drop our hopes of having a > time based autovacuum?
I don't think so, but I didn't know we had hopes for time-based autovacuum. What exactly do you mean? Initially there were some thoughts on schedule-based autovacuum parameters, but it seems that interest has dropped for that feature, so I haven't pushed much for that. However, I don't think that this patch series affects that in any way. BTW I think this patch series makes sense, though I haven't looked at it in detail. I guess it means I'll have to have a look at the IMessages stuff as well. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
