Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > The only way I'd be willing to label those things immutable was if > we did something to lock down lc_monetary for the life of a > database (ie, make it work more like lc_collate does now). Which > might be a good idea, but it's not how it works today. Interesting. In general, what is involved in locking something like this down for the life of a database? -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
