Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > All that having been said, I think the issue here is that the query > planner isn't inferring that d1.ID=<some constant> implies d2.ID=<some > constant>, even though there's a join clause d1.ID=d2.ID.
I think that's what the Equivalence Classes are for. Or at least that's what they do in my head, not forcibly in the code. The specific diff between the two queries isĀ : JOIN DocPrimary d2 ON d2.BasedOn=d1.ID - WHERE (d1.ID=234409763) or (d2.ID=234409763) + WHERE (d2.BasedOn=234409763) or (d2.ID=234409763) So the OP would appreciate that the planner is able to consider applying the restriction on d2.BasedOn rather than d1.ID given that d2.BasedOn is the same thing as d1.ID, from the JOIN. I have no idea if Equivalence Classes are where to look for this, and if they're meant to extend up to there, and if that's something possible or wise to implement, though. Regards, -- dim -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers