Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > It would result in a massive merge commit and the duplication of > the entire history. Ah, well, if the two repositories don't share the same IDs, it a clear no-go. Now that I think about it, it would be a bit much to expect those to match on independent conversions from CVS. How is this going to play out when we do the "official" conversion to git? Will those of us on repositories based off of git.postgresql.org be faced with similar issues, or are we using the repo there as the base for the conversion? -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
