On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah, I'd like some more votes, too. Aside from what I suggested > (array_join/array_split), I think my favorite is your #5.
-1 for me for any name that is of the form of: type_operation(); we don't have bytea_encode, array_unnest(), date_to_char(), etc. the non-internal ones that we do have (mostly array funcs), are improperly named imo. this is sql, not c. suppose we want to extend string serialization to row types? why not serialize/unserialize? merlin -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
