(2010/07/23 13:00), Robert Haas wrote: > 2010/7/22 KaiGai Kohei<kai...@ak.jp.nec.com>: >> Anyway, it is an obvious feature, and seems to me works fine. > > So this makes it sound like you like the feature. > >> However, it is not clear for me how do we make progress this feature. >> If we support a command to include other configuration, it also needs >> to patch on the postgresql backend, not only initdb. > > I don't know what this means. > >> In my personal opinion, as long as you don't need any special configuration >> under the single user mode or bootstraping mode launched by initdb, >> we can modify it using shell script or others later. > > But here it sounds like you're saying we don't need the feature > because may as well just edit postgresql.conf by hand. > > So I'm confused. > Sorry for the confusion.
What I wanted to say is the patch itself is fine but we need to make consensus before the detailed code reviewing. Thanks, -- KaiGai Kohei <kai...@ak.jp.nec.com> -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
