On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 6:48 AM, Marko Tiikkaja
> <marko.tiikk...@cs.helsinki.fi> wrote:
>> On 7/26/10 1:44 PM +0300, Fujii Masao wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Yeb Havinga<yebhavi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I wasn't entirely clear. My suggestion was to have only
>>>>
>>>> acknowledge_commit = {no|recv|fsync|replay}
>>>>
>>>> instead of
>>>>
>>>> replication_mode = {async|recv|fsync|replay}
>>>
>>> Okay, I'll change the patch accordingly.
>>
>> For what it's worth, I think replication_mode is a lot clearer.
>> Acknowledge_commit sounds like it would do something similar to
>> asynchronous_commit.
>
> I agree.
As the result of the vote, I'll leave the parameter "replication_mode"
as it is.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
