Jeff Davis <pg...@j-davis.com> writes:
> However, when Simon said "We definitely shouldn't do anything that
> leaves standby different to primary." you said "obviously". Fix2 can
> leave a difference between the two, because zeroed pages at the end of
> the heap file on the primary will not be sent to the standby (the
> standby will only create the zeroed pages if a higher block number is
> sent; which won't be the case if the zeroed pages are at the end).
> As we discussed before, that looks inconsequential, but I just want to
> make sure that it's understood.
I understand it, and I don't like it one bit. I haven't caught up on
this thread yet, but I think the only acceptable solution is one that
leaves the slave in the *same* state as the master. Not a state that
we hope will behave equivalently. I can think of too many corner cases
where it might not. (In fact, having a zeroed page in a relation is
already a corner case in itself, so the amount of testing you'd get for
such behaviors is epsilon squared. You don't want to take that bet.)
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
