On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 14:22 -0700, Jeff Davis wrote: > On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 15:37 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > So nevermind that distraction. I'm back to thinking that fix1 is > > the way to go. > > Agreed. > > It's uncontroversial to have a simple guard against corrupting an > uninitialized page, and uncontroversial is good for things that will be > back-patched.
Still don't understand why we would not initialize such pages. If we're copying a relation we must know enough about it to init a page. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
