[ forgot to answer this part ]

Robert Haas <[email protected]> writes:
> Another question here is whether we should just fix this in CVS HEAD,
> or whether there's any reason to back-patch it.

Agreed, fixing it in HEAD seems sufficient.

                        regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to