Robert Haas 07/31/10 12:33 PM >>> > Tom Lane wrote: >> Robert Haas writes: >>> I think this whole discussion is starting with the wrong premise. >>> This is not a bug fix; therefore, it's 9.1 material. >> >> Failing to store stats isn't a bug? > > Well, it kind of sounds more like you're removing a known > limitation than fixing a bug. It's operating as designed and documented. There is room for enhancement, but the only thing which could possibly justify this as 9.0 material is if there was a demonstrated performance regression in 9.0 for which this was the safest cure. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
