2010/8/7 Joshua Tolley <eggyk...@gmail.com>:
> On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 04:46:51PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> I am sending a updated version.
>
> I've been looking at the changes to gram.y, and noted the comment under
> func_expr
> where you added CUBE and ROLLUP definitions. It says that CUBE can't be a
> reserved keyword because it's already used in the cube contrib module. But
> then the changes to kwlist.h include this:
>
I am little bit confused now - it's bad comment - and I have to verify
it. What I remember, we cannot to use a two parser's rules, because it
going to a conflict. So there have to be used a trick with a moving to
decision to transform stage, where we have a context info. I have to
recheck a minimal level - probably it can't be a RESERVED_KEYWORD.
Because then we can't to create a function "cube".
> + PG_KEYWORD("cube", CUBE, RESERVED_KEYWORD)
> ...
> + PG_KEYWORD("rollup", ROLLUP, RESERVED_KEYWORD)
>
> ...and CUBE and ROLLUP are added in gram.y under the reserved_keyword list. I
> realize things like CURRENT_TIME, that also have special entries in the
> func_expr grammar, are also reserved keywords, but this all seems at odds with
> the comment. What am I missing? Is the comment simply pointing out that the
> designation of CUBE and ROLLUP as reserved keywords will have to change at
> some point, but it hasn't been implemented yet (or no one has figured out how
> to do it)?
>
> --
> Joshua Tolley / eggyknap
> End Point Corporation
> http://www.endpoint.com
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkxcjSIACgkQRiRfCGf1UMPpCwCcCHBh/1NiLykIcVYgPyfbIegF
> xq0AoID75rCPiW8yf29OSkaJVza1FQt5
> =PcLs
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
