Mike Fowler <m...@mlfowler.com> writes: > On 06/08/10 20:55, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> On fre, 2010-08-06 at 09:04 +0100, Mike Fowler wrote: >>> If the patch is to be committed, does it make sense for me to refine >>> it such that it uses the new xpath internal function you extracted in >>> the xmlexists patch? >> >> Yes, you can probably shrink this patch down to about 20 lines.
> Updated the patch so that it will apply to head and re-worked the > function to use the new xpath internal function. Applied with minor corrections (improved docs, fixed regression tests, adjusted OIDs for CVS HEAD). regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers