On 11/08/10 17:45, Simon Riggs wrote:
It seems clear that your work in this area will interfere with the work
on partitioning and insert routing.

Nothing concrete has come out of that work yet. And we should have MERGE work with inherited tables, regardless of any future work that may happen with partitioning.

We've seen it time and time again
that big projects that aim to deliver towards end of a release cycle
interfere with dev of other projects and leave loose ends from
unforeseen interactions. There's no need for that.

I don't understand what you're saying, we're not in the end of a release cycle.

--
  Heikki Linnakangas
  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to