Mike Fowler <m...@mlfowler.com> writes: > On 11/08/10 21:27, Tom Lane wrote: >> Yes. Mike, are you expecting to submit a new version before the end of >> the week?
> Yes and here it is, apologies for the delay. I have re-implemented > xml_is_well_formed such that it is sensitive to the XMLOPTION. The > additional _document and _content methods are now present. Tests and > documentation adjusted to suit. Applied with minor cleanups, mostly in the documentation. The only thing that seems worth remarking on is that since xml_is_well_formed now depends on a GUC variable, it *cannot* be marked IMMUTABLE. The right marking in such cases is STABLE. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers