Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> No doubt, but the TODO entry you removed is still 100% accurately
>> worded, and what's more the archive entry it links to clearly describes
>> exactly the point at issue, namely that grouping by a PK *isn't*
>> indeterminate. You were wrong to remove it.
> OK, I put it back, but I still feel we might not need it anymore.
Even if you're willing to believe that the questions will stop once
we have this feature, that won't happen for more than a year.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
