James William Pye <li...@jwp.name> writes:
> On Aug 13, 2010, at 5:20 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I see several calls in plpython.c that seem to refer to PyCObject stuff.
>> Anybody have any idea if we need to do something about this?
> Well, we should at least be checking for an exception here anyways:
> proc->me = PyCObject_FromVoidPtr(proc, NULL);
> PyDict_SetItemString(PLy_procedure_cache, key, proc->me);
> if (proc->me == NULL) complain();
Just to clarify, you're recommending something like
proc->me = PyCObject_FromVoidPtr(proc, NULL);
+ if (proc->me == NULL)
+ elog(ERROR, "could not create PyCObject for function");
PyDict_SetItemString(PLy_procedure_cache, key, proc->me);
correct? (Hm, and it looks like we'd better move the pfree just above that...)
> AFA a better fix is concerned, the shortest route would seem to be to
> use the new capsule stuff iff Python >= 2.7.
Yeah, and since we'll have to back-patch it, a fairly noninvasive patch
would be nice. Will you work on that?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
