On 14 August 2010 13:12, Marko Tiikkaja <marko.tiikk...@cs.helsinki.fi> wrote: > On 2010-08-08 1:45 PM +0300, I wrote: >> >> On 8/8/2010 12:49 PM, Dean Rasheed wrote: >>> >>> For those migrating code from Oracle, providing this feature as-is >>> might be valuable, since presumably they are not too concerned about >>> these concurrency issues. Ideally we'd want to do better though. >> >> Yes, you might be right. This feature on its on can greatly simplify >> what people now have to do to get triggers on views. > > This weekend I had the luxury of working with our VIEW system, and it seems > like I greatly underestimated the power of this feature, even if the > concurrency issues I've mentioned in this thread would be left unaddressed. > > I haven't looked at the patch yet (I plan to do so), but +100 for this > feature. >
Thanks for your feedback. I'd be interested in any ideas on the concurrency issues. > Should we expect a new patch any time soon? > I hope to look at this again tomorrow. I'll try to post an updated patch then, with some real trigger code, but without addressing any of the concurrency issues. Regards, Dean -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
