On 15 August 2010 18:38, Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rash...@gmail.com> wrote: > There are still a number of things left todo: > - extend ALTER VIEW with enable/disable trigger commands
On further reflection, I wonder if the ability to disable VIEW triggers is needed/wanted at all. I just noticed that while it is possible to disable a RULE on a TABLE, it is not possible to do so on VIEW. This certainly makes sense for the _RETURN rule, although possibly some people might have a use for disabling other rules on views. The situation with triggers is similar - disabling an INSTEAD OF trigger would be pointless, and could only lead to errors when updating the view. Some people may have a use case for disabling BEFORE and AFTER statement triggers on views, but I suspect that the number of such cases is small, and I'm tempted to omit this, for now at least. Thoughts? - Dean -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
