2010/8/17 Cédric Villemain <cedric.villemain.deb...@gmail.com>: > 2010/8/17 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>: >> =?ISO-8859-1?Q?C=E9dric_Villemain?= <cedric.villemain.deb...@gmail.com> >> writes: >>> 2010/8/16 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>: >>>> =?ISO-8859-1?Q?C=E9dric_Villemain?= <cedric.villemain.deb...@gmail.com> >>>> writes: >>>>> Unfortunely the current implementation of EXECUTE USING is not working >>>>> this way. >>>> >>>> Uh ... what do you base that statement on? >> >>> About the planning behavior ? >>> With USING, I get a seqscan (cost and long), without USING I have an >>> indexscan(short and costless). >> >> It works as expected for me. What PG version are you using exactly? >> Could you provide a self-contained example? > > postgresql 8.4.4. Yes I'll work one out this evening. > more or less : table foo (uid char(32) PK, flag boolean), uids are > md5sum. +-6M rows.
Here we are. A simple usecase. -- Cédric Villemain 2ndQuadrant http://2ndQuadrant.fr/ PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
usecase_exec_using.sql
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
