David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> writes: > Apart from the medians, which "median-like" aggregates do you have in > mind to start with? If you can provide examples of "median-like" > aggregates that people might need to implement as user-defined > aggregates, or other places where people would use this machinery, it > will make your case stronger for this refactoring.
There would be plenty of scope to re-use the machinery without any SQL-level extensions. All you need is a polymorphic aggregate transition function that maintains a tuplestore or whatever. I don't see that extra syntax in CREATE AGGREGATE is really buying much of anything. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers