Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> writes: > The explanation of trace_recovery_messages in the document > is inconsistent with the definition of it in guc.c.
I've applied a patch for this.
I was tempted to propose that we just rip out trace_recovery_messages
altogether, but I suppose Simon would object.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
