On 2010-08-20 11:39 AM +0300, Josh Berkus wrote:
On 8/19/10 3:51 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
Two sessions, in transaction:
Process A Process B
update session where id = X;
update order where orderid = 5;
update order where orderid = 5;
update order where orderid = 5;
... deadlock error.
Johto on IRC pointed out I left something out of the above: "session" is
referenced in an FK by "orders", and session = X is related to orderid = 5.
Right, that would result in a deadlock. I think truly serializable
transactions still need to SELECT FOR SHARE here for foreign keys to
work, no?
Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
