Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes: > In fact, is the only thing that's wrong here the commit message? > Because it's probably trivial to just patch that away.. Hmm, but i > guess we'd like to hav ethe actual commit message and not just another > fixed one..
If I understand Max's statements correctly, there is an observable problem in the actual git history, not just the commit log entries: it will believe that a file added on a branch had been there since the branch forked off, not just as of the time it got added. Now, I would think that your tests of file contents as of the various release tags should have caught extra files, so maybe I'm misunderstanding. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers