On Aug 20, 2010, at 12:15 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> No, I mean 9.0.0beta4. If we were to adopt the Semantic Versioning spec, one >> would *always* use X.Y.Z, with optional ASCII characters appended to Z to >> add meaning (including "less than unadorned Z). > > Well, I for one will fiercely resist adopting any such standard, because > it's directly opposite to the way that RPM will sort such version numbers.
Which is how? > Apparently whoever wrote "Semantic Versioning" didn't bother to inquire > into existing practice. Tom Preston-Warner of GitHub fame. Best, David -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
