On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 11:48:12AM -0700, David Wheeler wrote: > On Aug 20, 2010, at 11:47 AM, David Fetter wrote: > > >> No idea what you mean by that, but generally it's a bad idea to > >> switch from dotted-integer version numbers and numeric version > >> numbers. See Perl (Quel désastre!). > > > > I'm thinking that after 9.0, the first release of the next major > > version should be 10.0, and the one after that, 11.0, etc., etc. > > Oh. Good luck with that. I disagree, FWIW. > > > The current system give people the completely false impression > > that 7.0 and 7.4 are somehow similar. > > On what planet?
"We're using Postgre 8" See also all the flocks of tools that claim to support "Postgres 8" Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
