On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 08:11:18AM +0800, Boxuan Zhai wrote: > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 4:56 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 11:02:41PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > > > On 24/08/10 16:35, Boxuan Zhai wrote: > > > >Hi, > > > > > > > >I finished the MERGE on inheritance tables. Now comes the > > > >merge_v201 > > > > > > Oh, great! That means that all the known issues are fixed now, > > > and all that's left is fixing any issues raised in review. > > > > > > I've added this to the September commitfest, but I hope I'll > > > find some time to look at this before that. I welcome anyone > > > else to review this too! > > I have to ask one question: On a short review of the discussion > > and the patch I didn't find anything about the concurrency issues > > involved (at least nodeModifyTable.c didnt show any). Whats the > > plan to go forward at that subject? I think the patch needs to > > lock tables exclusively (the pg level, not access exclusive) as > > long as there is no additional handling... > > > > Thanks for the work Boxuan! > > The concurrency issues are not involved. I don't know much about > this part. I think we need more discussion on it.
I seem to recall Simon had volunteered some of 2ndQuadrant's time on this. :) Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers