Fujii Masao <[email protected]> writes:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 11:25 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hmm, agreed, seems like an oversight in hot standby. Before that, we didn't
>> update pg_subtrans during recovery, so there was no point truncating it. But
>> in hot standby, we do update it, so we need to truncate it too.
> Yes. The attached patch changes a restartpoint so that it truncates
> pg_subtrans
> when hot standby is enabled.
Has StartupSUBTRANS been done?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
