Tom Lane wrote: > Oh, I think we were talking at cross-purposes then. What you're really > unhappy about is that this uses a list of two-element sublists? Yeah, > I agree, that's a messy data structure; a list of DefElem would be > perhaps cleaner. Not sure if it matters all that much though, since the > list only exists in the context of a few productions in gram.y. Perhaps > adding a couple of lines of documentation would be better than changing > the code.
Yea, documenation and/or a list of DefElem would be nicer. The problem is that people are going to copy this in the future, so I may as well do it right. Can't take more than 20 minutes. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
