On 3 September 2010 12:30, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 13:25, Thom Brown <t...@linux.com> wrote: >> On 3 September 2010 12:19, Heikki Linnakangas >> <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >>> TODO: >>> >>> * We need a smarter way to do pg_start/stop_backup() with this. At the >>> moment, you can only have one backup running at a time, but we shouldn't >>> have that limitation with this built-in mechanism. >> >> Would it be possible to not require pg_start/stop_backup() for this >> new feature? (yes, I'm probably missing something obvious here) > > You don't need to run it *manually*, but the process needs to run it > automatically in the background for you. Which it does already in the > suggested patch.
Ah, clearly I didn't read the patch in any detail. Thanks :) -- Thom Brown Twitter: @darkixion IRC (freenode): dark_ixion Registered Linux user: #516935 -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
