Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> On 04/09/10 22:41, Tom Lane wrote:
>> So we don't need a version check unless you're worried about somebody
>> trying to run Postgres 9.x on OS X 10.2 (which was retired in 2003).
> What happens if someone does? Crash, or just wonky ps output? If it's
> the latter, seems safe to backpatch.
Wonky ps output. I don't recall exactly how wonky, but back in the day
it looked better blank-padded.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
