On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 04:55, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Max Bowsher <m...@f2s.com> wrote: >>>> and the result is that things are looking pretty clean :-) >>> >>> Hey, that's great. But I wonder why Magnus got a different result. >> >> This is the first time I've posted these incantations for excising the >> unwanted history, so he would not have been using them. > > Well, he did something fairly similar. Not sure if it was exactly the same.
No. I used "cvs admin", not rcs. The specific commands I ran were the following (and I'm pretty darn sure I posted this before): cd pgsql/src/backend/parser cvs admin -o 2.90.2.1:2.90.2.2 gram.c cvs admin -o 2.89: gram.c cd ../../interfaces/ecpg/preproc cvs admin -o 1.5.2.1:1.5.2.2 pgc.c cvs admin -o 1.3: pgc.c cvs admin -o 1.11.2.1:1.11.2.2 preproc.c cvs admin -o 1.7: preproc.c I would assume cvs just runs rcs commands behind the scenes, but I confess knowing way too little about that stuff to be sure ;) I'll be happy to re-run with the rcs commands instead. >>> Can you post the repo you ended up with somewhere? >> >> Well, it's a Bazaar repository at the moment :-) >> >> But, I'll re-run it targetting git, and push it somewhere. github? >> anywhere better? > > No, that's fine. Yes, it's fine - just please be sure to remove the repository once we're done with the "master conversion", so people don't end up accidentally cloning an incorrect one :D -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
