Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> writes: > Another thing that could raise eyebrows is that I chose to remove the > "missing_ok" argument from get_role_oid_or_public, so it's not a perfect > mirror of it. None of the current callers need it, but perhaps people > would like these functions to be consistent.
Well, it can't be really consistent anyway: if you did have a missing_ok argument then you'd need an unusual return convention so you could distinguish "missing" from "public". As long as this is a static function I don't see a strong need for it to mimic the API of the general get_whatever_oid functions. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers