Robert Haas <[email protected]> writes:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
>> The above scenario is only a risk if you suppose that dropping a
>> relation that lacks physical storage will nonetheless result in
>> attempted unlink()s. I think that that's probably not the case;
> Why? How would we know that it didn't have physical storage prior to
> attempting the unlinks?
>From the relkind.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
