2010/9/16 Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com>: > On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 8:57 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Hitoshi Harada <umi.tan...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> 2010/9/16 Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com>: >>>> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>>>> Yet there are other cases that probably *could* work well based on a >>>>> storage-level abstraction boundary; index-organized tables for instance. >>>>> So I think we need to have some realistic idea of what we want to >>>>> support and design an API accordingly, not hope that if we don't >>>>> know what we want we will somehow manage to pick an API that makes >>>>> all things possible. >>>> >>>> Agreed. Random ideas: index-organized tables... >>> >>> I'd love to see a table that is based on one of the existing KVSs. >> >> I'm not familiar with the term KVS? > > Oh, key-value store, I bet. Yeah, that would be cool.
That's it. Like Redis, Tokyo Cabinet, or something. -- Hitoshi Harada -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
