On tor, 2010-09-16 at 15:56 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > I reiterate my earlier criticism of this whole approach: it seems to > assume that computing query progress is something inexpensive enough > that we can afford to do it regardless of whether anyone is looking.
That assumption appears to hold so far. Anyway, do you have an alternative suggestion? -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
