On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 09:15 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote: > On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 11:09 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > > That said, there's a few small things that can be progressed > > regardless of the details of synchronous replication. There's the > > changes to trigger failover with a signal, and it seems that we'll > > need some libpq changes to allow acknowledgments to be sent back to > > the master regardless of the rest of the design. We can discuss those > > in separate threads in parallel. > > Agree to both of those points.
But I don't agree that those things should be committed just yet. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
