On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: > Robert Haas <[email protected]> writes: >> Magnus posted an updated conversion this morning. > >> http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=postgresql-migration.git;a=summary > >> Evidently, however, he didn't do the same things you did, because >> there are DEFINITELY more than 9 manufactured commits in this one. > > Um ... I just did > git clone git://git.postgresql.org/git/postgresql-migration.git > and I only see nine. It's got some *other* problems though; compared > to a conversion I just finished locally, it's missing a whole lot of > history for some of the old jdbc files. > > Is there any possibility that "git clone" isn't very trustworthy? > It's a bit scary that we don't see identical views of this repository.
*scratches head* I did a git-fetch into an existing copy of the old contents of that repository, rather than a fresh clone. Let me nuke it and start over. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
