> timestamptz is a preferred type, so no you probably can't change that
> without breaking a lot of stuff. It's not immediately clear to me why
> that's wrong anyway.
Just that having a value implicitly acquire time zone information it
didn't originally have seems dangerous. But I can't come up with a
specific example of breakage right now -- at least not one on a single
server.
--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
