On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Mark Wong <mark...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: >> Andrew Dunstan wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 09/18/2010 10:22 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: >>> > Dave Page wrote: >>> >> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Bruce Momjian<br...@momjian.us> wrote: >>> >>> FYI, I have compiled/installed git 1.7.3.rc2 on my BSD/OS 4.3.1 machine >>> >>> with the attached minor changes. >>> >> I thought you were replacing that old thing with pile of hardware that >>> >> Matthew was putting together? >>> > Matthew was busy this summer so I am going to try to get some of his >>> > time by January to switch to Ubuntu. And some people are complaining we >>> > will lose a BSD test machine once I switch. >>> > >>> >>> Test machines belong in the buildfarm. And why would they complain about >>> losing a machine running a totally out of date and unsupported OS? Maybe >>> you should run BeOS instead. >> >> Well, I can run tests for folks before they apply a patch and "red" the >> build farm. I can also research fixes easier because I am using the OS, >> rather than running blind tests. I am just telling you what people told >> me. > > I've been slowly trying to rebuild something that was in use at the > OSDL to test patches. I just proofed something that I think works > with the git repository: > > http://207.173.203.223:5000/patch/show/48 > > If you click on the PASS or FAIL text, it will display the SHA1, > author and commit message that the patch was applied to. Think this > will be useful?
Seems interesting. You might need to take precautions against someone uploading a trojan, though. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
