On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Markus Wanner <mar...@bluegap.ch> wrote: > On 09/21/2010 03:46 PM, Robert Haas wrote: >> Wait, are we in violent agreement here? An overall limit on the >> number of parallel jobs is exactly what I think *does* make sense. >> It's the other knobs I find odd. > > Note that the max setting I've been talking about here is the maximum > amount of *idle* workers allowed. It does not include busy bgworkers.
Oh, wow. Is there another limit on the total number of bgworkers? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
