On Sep 21, 2010, at 6:20 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> While this isn't much worse than what I was used to with CVS, it's
> definitely not better. I think that I could simplify transferring the
> patch back to older branches if I could use git cherry-pick. However,
> that only works on already-committed patches. If I commit in master
> before I start working on 9.0, and so on back, then the commits will be
> separated in time by a significant amount, thus destroying any chance of
> having git_topo_order recognize them as related. So we're back up
> against the problem of git not really understanding the relationships of
> patches in different branches.
You could commit in each one as you go, cherry-pick, and then in each one
git reset --soft HEAD^
Then they'd all be patched and staged.
Best,
David
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
