Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Joshua D. Drake <j...@commandprompt.com>
> wrote:
>> On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 13:00 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> But it CAN'T be a system catalog, because, among other problems, that
>>> rules out cascading slaves, which are a feature a lot of people
>>> probably want to eventually have.
>>
>> I guarantee you there is a way around the cascade slave problem.
> And that would be...?
Indeed. If it's a catalog then it has to be exactly the same on the
master and every slave; which is probably a constraint we don't want
for numerous reasons, not only cascade arrangements.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
