On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > Josh Berkus wrote: >> On 9/22/10 6:00 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> > I think you missed the point of my response, which is that there are >> > easily 106 more-pressing things to work on than the size of timetz. >> > Do you know of any actual use cases for it? >> >> It would be a good project to add to the list of "easy TODOs to get >> started with." > > Except for the pg_upgrade issue.
Which is a big "except". -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
