On 24/09/10 14:47, Simon Riggs wrote:
On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 14:12 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
What I'm saying is that in a two standby situation, if
you're willing to continue operation as usual in the master even if
the standby is down, you're not doing synchronous replication.
Oracle and I disagree with you on that point, but I am more interested
in behaviour than semantics.
If you have two standbys and one is down, please explain how data loss
has occurred.
Sorry, that was a typo. As Aidan guessed, I meant "even in a two server
situation", ie. one master and one slave.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
