On 24/09/10 17:13, Simon Riggs wrote:
On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 16:01 +0200, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
I'd like that we now follow Josh Berkus (and some other) advice now, and
start a new thread to decide what we mean by synchronous replication,
what kind of normal behaviour we want and what responses to errors we
expect to be able to deal with in what (optional) ways.
What I intend to do from here is make a list of all desired use cases,
then ask for people to propose ways of configuring those. Hopefully we
don't need to discuss the meaning of the phrase "sync rep", we just need
to look at the use cases.
Yes, that seems like a good way forward.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
